Skip to main content

Differentiation

Differentiation is the buzz word in education right now. I think the focus needs to be on EQUITY. I agree that all students do not learn in the same way. I want to do a better job to give each student what he or she needs instead of a one size fits all education. Differentiation is different in math than it is in other classes, however. There aren't different levels of accomplishment in a math problem unless you want some students to simply solve while others can expain and write in depth about why their solution and process works. The problem is, what I'm teaching now, I can't split into levels. All students need to be able to do all types of problems that I present in class.

A fellow math teacher pointed out to me today that differentiation in a math classroom often results in tracking. The students that struggle with unit 1 will probably struggle with unit 2 and will probably struggle with unit 3... You get the idea. Often the same students struggle with almost everything we learn. If we were to differentiate on a day-to-day basis, the same students would always be doing the enrichment activities while the same other group would always be doing relearning activities. I don't know what best practice is to address this.

Is it okay for the same students to be in the same groups almost all the time? Is it wrong to have the same students in the struggling group time after time?

And my biggest question...

What about the students who aren't getting it because of choices they're making? Should I stop the class and differentiate for those students? Is that babying them? Should differentiation be so good for the upper students that I should do it anyway just so they can expand their learning? Well, yes but at what cost to the future curriculum?

If we were to focus more on equity than just differentiation, then we would be able to address the fact that some students need something to kick them into gear so they realize outside work is required sometimes and effort pays off. It's not equitable to teach a student that if they don't put in any outside work, then we'll just spend more time in class helping them. That is the opposite of the lesson some of those students need to learn... Then we run into the problem with graduation and the emphasis on learning content over behavior and soft skills.

If anyone has the answer to these questions, feel free to share them with me ; )

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

God and Classroom Management

Ezekiel 20:11-13 "I gave them my decrees and made known to them my laws," (God gave clear and consistent expectations. I would bet he made sure they were available in multiple formats so people could both read and hear them.) "for the man who obeys them will live by them." (I have way more wisdom and knowledge, not to mentioned a fully developed frontal lobe. I know the results of those bad choices already, so seriously, listen to me for your own good...) "Also I gave them my Sabbaths as a sign between us, so they would know that I the Lord made them holy." (Here I imagine God feels like I do when I spend hours planning a hands-on lesson that would make me curious and excited as a student. I bet he looked forward to the Sabbath because he imagined how excited he would be as a human to have this day to rest and appreciate what a great and loving God they have. He wants us to know he loves us and wants what's best for us, just like I want my ...

School vs. Real Life

I read a post on facebook today about things in the real world that students don't learn in school. It got me thinking about how we spiral everything in Geometry and Algebra 2. Here's how it works... We teach a brand new unit for about 2 weeks. During that time, we review something from a particular previous unit each day so that by the end of those two weeks, they have learned all the new material a little bit each day and reviewed all the "spiral" material a little bit each day. Then we give two tests, one over the new material and one over the "spiral" material. By doing this, they will experience all material once as new and a second time as spiral. This will allow them to take two tests over every unit. Their first test score affects their grade, but if they score higher on the second test, they get to keep just the higher score. If they score lower on the second test, we average the two test scores. Most students score higher on the second test becau...

"I feel like a bully when I expect the same achievement out of all students at the same time."

I have been teaching exponents to freshman and sophomores for the last week and a half. I had a carefully planned graphic organizer. I planned on spending 1 or 2 days per exponent property and moving on with the year without too much difficulty... Little did I know what I was up against. Apparently, exponents are not as simple as I had always thought they were. I don't think I really cared in high school why the properties worked. I was great at memorizing things that I needed to know, and so I never had a problem or a need to know, "Why." I was a grade-chaser all the way. Well after teaching every exponent property in the unit and giving a 5-question lesson quiz, I learned that perhaps some of my students had learned nothing over the last week and a half... That's not really true. They had partially learned the properties in isolation, but putting everything together was just too overwhelming. I agree, the students need more practice, but if I had sent them home ...