Skip to main content

Differentiation

Differentiation is the buzz word in education right now. I think the focus needs to be on EQUITY. I agree that all students do not learn in the same way. I want to do a better job to give each student what he or she needs instead of a one size fits all education. Differentiation is different in math than it is in other classes, however. There aren't different levels of accomplishment in a math problem unless you want some students to simply solve while others can expain and write in depth about why their solution and process works. The problem is, what I'm teaching now, I can't split into levels. All students need to be able to do all types of problems that I present in class.

A fellow math teacher pointed out to me today that differentiation in a math classroom often results in tracking. The students that struggle with unit 1 will probably struggle with unit 2 and will probably struggle with unit 3... You get the idea. Often the same students struggle with almost everything we learn. If we were to differentiate on a day-to-day basis, the same students would always be doing the enrichment activities while the same other group would always be doing relearning activities. I don't know what best practice is to address this.

Is it okay for the same students to be in the same groups almost all the time? Is it wrong to have the same students in the struggling group time after time?

And my biggest question...

What about the students who aren't getting it because of choices they're making? Should I stop the class and differentiate for those students? Is that babying them? Should differentiation be so good for the upper students that I should do it anyway just so they can expand their learning? Well, yes but at what cost to the future curriculum?

If we were to focus more on equity than just differentiation, then we would be able to address the fact that some students need something to kick them into gear so they realize outside work is required sometimes and effort pays off. It's not equitable to teach a student that if they don't put in any outside work, then we'll just spend more time in class helping them. That is the opposite of the lesson some of those students need to learn... Then we run into the problem with graduation and the emphasis on learning content over behavior and soft skills.

If anyone has the answer to these questions, feel free to share them with me ; )

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Second Chances

I've been thinking about second chances constantly lately. As an adult, think about all the times you've been given a second chance. I am not a perfect wife, but my husband gives me second chances all the time.  I tried to make cookies once with baking soda that was 2 years expired. They didn't turn out so great, but I have had other chances to bake things and I learned a value lesson about baking soda : ) I tried out for my church praise team and didn't make it. It was embarrassing and for a while I didn't feel like singing or playing the piano, but I can try out again and if I don't get so nervous next time, maybe I'll make it. I'm not banned forever because of one audition. I took the ACT twice when I was in high school, and my highest score was the only one colleges cared about.  My first year of teaching, I struggled quite a bit with classroom management. I needed more time and unfortunately first-hand experience to just begin lea...

Thought about mapping activity

I was reading a few teachers talking about teaching their students to use maps and analyse the changes as well as using GPS and geocashing to use latitude and longitude. Correct me if I'm wrong, but you guys are science teachers? Based on that assumption, I was thinking it would be neat to incorporate a corresponding math project involving graphing. Maybe the students first learn about it with the science teachers. They do the project based lesson with maps and GPS. Then they could come to my math class and create their own map including cordinates. They could use slope and find distances between locations on their map. They could even hide their own treasures around the school campus and then trade their maps with other students to find each others' "treasures." They could use the concept of slope to tell students how to find the treasure. Maybe they have to start at a certain latitude or longitude and then go a certain direction with a certain slope, and they woul...

I hate grading...

Right now my kids are taking a test, and I'm pondering grading. If we want future teachers to know what our students got out of our class, why don't we just give them one big test at the end of the semester, and that's their grade? I know we would have to be very careful about keeping everything fresh and constant and using it multiple times so they are prepared and remember it until then, but is that what really matters? I want them to know how they're doing along the way. For that reason I like grading things along the way so they see if they're doing things correctly or not. Couldn't this be done just as easily in a formative way? We could even grade some things and make them track their own progress, but not actually grade or count anything until their test at the end of the year. In this way, we wouldn't be held back by keeping things consistent. Right now we test over everything multiple times. I'm not knocking out system at all, because I've...